Wk 8: F.A.Q about Evoltuion

Professor Dawkins i think has stable feedback to be giving back, but does it all make sense to all others as it makes sense to him? I guess if he explains it a basic way in which we can keep track of, we might get the hang of what goes on in his mind. But as Dawkins replies to an answer about religion and God, yes he says that there is no evidence of a n existing God for which he does believe in one, that does not mean we can not appreciate this universe for what a beautiful place it is. I agree with him, just because some believe there is no God that does not mean we have to despise of everything around us. Some kind of development of science created in what we live in today. We have to support science some how because there is evidence of that. But one question i ask myself, i know there is no physical evidence of God but what if there was one and all this was a test. I mean. what if he/she/they have us all on a test seeing who will believe in their presence without evidence of them existing? I mean that is one question that i always wanted to know but i do know that it is quite impossible. i wonder how Dawkins would answer to a question like that, would he just ignore it and say no evidence supporting anything religious is available or actually take time to think about it. It is just weird to me that there are scientists that do believe in a super power out there but do they do it to feel better emotionally and spiritually or do they do it because they truly believe there is something out there greater than the human being?